Tuesday, November 23, 2010

Home Ec-quality 101

A massive home economics movement would help equality. Without knowing about work that has traditionally been the purview of women, men could not possibly understand the true value and skill involved in such work. The Kamahamaha Schools in Hawaii used to have cabins where their female boarding students lived with orphan infants and young children to learn the best practices of raising children. They were eliminated in the 1950's, but why? Why can't we start day care facilities, or classroom sharing that are set up in a similar way, of course under strict adult control. If we made these classes mandatory, the benefits would be significant.

  • Everyone, including men, would have knowledge about basic child rearing, including appropriate divisions of labor.
  • Fathers would be able to have at least some limited experience with babies under supervision before the were on their own.
  • The entire society would benefit from basic parenting skills, which is the fundamental building block of any society.
  • Free or low cost childcare would be built in, and both parents would be able to contribute financially as well as with real labor, creating more economic security for poor families and middle class families alike.

    Most importantly, by having class time to explore the actual science of household management, we would all value these skills that have been relegated to a lower status. In fact, this work is very important, if not the most important part of life, and should be recognized as such and taught in our schools once again, but without the division of sexual differences. We can never have true equality until we start to realize that traditionally feminine tasks, like child rearing and housekeeping, are critical to our society. We can never see these tasks as equally important as business skills unless men and women are equally knowledgeable in these tasks. Learned helplessness is in fact not learned, but a lack of learning that creates perceived valuelessness.

1 comment:

Micky said...

It occurs to me that increasing numbers of women are also ill equipped to keep house and take care of children by the time they leave home. I personally think that this is because mainstream second- and third-wave feminism have both failed to truly value traditionally women's work. They see it as a trap and an obstacle to liberation. Obviously, domesticity should no longer be compulsory or a pursuit that eclipses all other opportunities for women, as it was in the 50s. But it would do a world of good if we could reclaim it. Why would men ever value it if women themselves continue to eschew it or view it as unliberating?